"Buchser’s Negro paintings are progressive. He seems to have
been impressed at first with the grotesque or the merely picturesque in Negro
character, but he was not slow to penetrate to the poetical, and to do
justice to the sympathetic levity that Slavery super-induced upon
cheerfulness. But his latest advance is the most important. He has
discerned the ambition, the hope and the aspiration that mark the great
transition which the Negro race in this country is now undergoing - a
transition, perhaps, the most rapid, gigantic, and beneficent which the
history possesses the genius to become the historian upon canvas of this
grand process (...) there is here one of the most fruitful fields which
art has ever attempted to cultivate."
(New York Daily Tribune, January 29, 1870)
Buchser could not lure everybody to the point he wanted - not
everybody likes to plunge into a satisfying subject matter. Some people
reminded distant and questioned the truth of Buchser’s scenes, and the
artist himself was struck by the fact that the overwhelming majority of
American citizens were not spontaneously sympathetic with the motif of
black Americans. Their different political background led to a different
approach. During Reconstruction white Americans assumed that a political
agenda dictated Buchser’s choice of this subject matter. Even when
they could not find a clear message, they suspicions lingered.
The Swiss artist expected that the ruling class in the former Union
states would identify with the destiny of the liberated slaves after
having fought a bloody civil war for their freedom. But he found not
such empathy. Rather, he noticed with a certain indignation that blacks
did not have full citizenship. But a certain kind of identification is
necessary for Buchser’s scenes of everyday life to achieve their full
effect. A large part of the North American art public resisted active
participation in the creating of meaning.
Art critics who reviewed exhibitions of Buchser’s work in New York
and Washington called the artist a foreigner and a European. For
American writers this was the only explanation for the fact that the
artist supposedly longed to participate in the life of the Other, that
he seemed able to identify with the existence of Native and African
Americans. Only for Europeans were the lives of these people totally
unfamiliar and therefore impregnated with the promise of a richer
existence. Such Kolportage, or transference, allows the beholder
to envision a better world on the condition that he gives up his
distance and doubt, thereby helping the viewer escape the sorrows or the
boredom of his everyday life. Thus this art form depends strongly on the
experiences each beholder has had during his life.